Fumadocs

比较

Fumadocs 与其他现有框架有什么不同?

Nextra

Fumadocs 深受 Nextra 的启发。例如,路由约定。这就是为什么 meta.json 也存在于 Fumadocs 中的原因。

🌐 Fumadocs is highly inspired by Nextra. For example, the Routing Conventions. That is why meta.json also exists in Fumadocs.

与 Fumadocs 相比,Nextra 更加有自己的观点,因此作为副作用,你必须手动配置一些东西,而不是简单地编辑一个配置文件。

🌐 Nextra is more opinionated than Fumadocs, as a side effect, you have to configure things manually compared to simply editing a configuration file.

如果你想对所有内容有更多控制,比如将其添加到现有代码库或实现高级路由,Fumadocs 会非常适合。

🌐 Fumadocs works great if you want more control over everything, such as adding it to an existing codebase or implementing advanced routing.

功能表

🌐 Feature Table

FeatureFumadocsNextra
Static GenerationYesYes
CachedYesYes
Light/Dark ModeYesYes
Syntax HighlightingYesYes
Table of ContentsYesYes
Full-text SearchYesYes
i18nYesYes
Last Git Edit TimeYesYes
Page IconsYesYes, via _meta.js files
RSCYesYes
Remote SourceYesYes
SEOVia MetadataYes
Built-in ComponentsYesYes
RTL LayoutYesYes

附加功能

🌐 Additional Features

通过像 TypeDoc 这样的第三方库支持的功能不会在此列出。

🌐 Features supported via 3rd party libraries like TypeDoc will not be listed here.

特性FumadocsNextra
OpenAPI 集成
TypeScript 文档生成
TypeScript Twoslash

Mintlify

Mintlify 是一项文档服务,与 Fumadocs 相比,它提供免费层,但并非完全免费和开源。

🌐 Mintlify is a documentation service, as compared to Fumadocs, it offers a free tier but isn't completely free and open source.

Fumadocs 不如 Mintlify 强大,例如,Mintlify 的 OpenAPI 集成功能。 作为 Fumadocs 的创建者,如果你对当前构建文档的方式感到满意,我不建议你从 Mintlify 转向 Fumadocs。 然而,我认为 Fumadocs 是一个适合所有希望拥有优雅文档的 React.js 开发者的工具。

🌐 Fumadocs is not as powerful as Mintlify, for example, the OpenAPI integration of Mintlify. As the creator of Fumadocs, I wouldn't recommend switching to Fumadocs from Mintlify if you're satisfied with the current way you build docs. However, I believe Fumadocs is a suitable tool for all React.js developers who want to have elegant docs.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus 是一个基于 React.js 的强大框架。它通过插件和自定义主题提供了许多非常棒的功能。

🌐 Docusaurus is a powerful framework based on React.js. It offers many cool features with plugins and custom themes.

较低复杂性

🌐 Lower Complexity

由于 Fumadocs 设计为与 React 框架集成,你可能需要更多的 React.js 知识才能入门。作为回报,Fumadocs 拥有更好的可定制性。

🌐 As Fumadocs is designed to integrate with React frameworks, you may need more knowledge of React.js to get started. In return, Fumadocs have better customizability.

对于简单的文档,如果你不需要任何特定于框架的功能,Docusaurus 可能是更好的选择。

🌐 For a simple docs, Docusaurus might be a better choice if you don't need any framework-specific functionality.

插件

🌐 Plugins

你可以通过插件轻松实现许多功能,它们的生态系统确实更大,并且由许多贡献者维护。

🌐 You can easily achieve many things with plugins, their ecosystem is indeed larger and maintained by many contributors.

相比之下,Fumadocs 的灵活性允许你自己进行实现,但可能需要更长时间来调试到满意的状态。

🌐 In comparison, the flexibility of Fumadocs allows you to implement them on your own, it may take longer to tune it to your satisfaction.

Last updated on

On this page